The code was updated, but the process was still running on yesterday's state. Found the root cause, patched the MA60 gap in the paper trading environment with a fallback, and restored the DRY_RUN buy cycle.
After implementing the coaching-focused MVP, I ran a 500m indoor test. Identified three issues: unresponsive start button, mismatched voice coaching due to missing GPS data, and a coaching interval mismatch with the test distance. Each root cause was isolated and fixed. The patched build gets validated in an outdoor run tomorrow.
Visitors were reading for an average of 2 minutes, but not a single click on the CTA. Here's why I changed 'Start for Free' to 'Organize My Thoughts for Free' — and the hypothesis behind it.
A solo maker who can't write a single line of code successfully tracked button clicks with GA4+GTM two days before the hackathon. Chulbuji designed what to measure, Meta-chulbuji implemented it. Now I don't guess — I prove.
From seeing an ad and thinking 'I want to try this' to asking Meta-chulbuji, executing through mistakes, and completing my first song 'Chuno: The Outcry' with a channel launch in just 2 hours
Dual BrainWhisperingRocket JumpMurekaKorean Traditional FusionMeta-chulbujiAI FreshmanPlusHumanMistakes as Process
I share my experience of escaping 'Tutorial Hell' and launching my first AI product, the 'Meta-chulbuji Report,' by collaborating with AI as a 'Plus-Human'.
Each lottery draw is an 'independent trial' unaffected by previous results. This post statistically explains why analyzing past 1,000 draws is meaningless for predicting the next winning numbers and why the 'gambler's fallacy' is a trap.